Evaluation criteria

Use this as your grading guide. Aim for the highest band by completing the “Distinction” checklist for each task.

Distinction = 70%+
70%+ Distinction 60-69% Merit 50-59% Pass Below 50% Fail
Task 1
Define Information Requirements
AIRs / OIR / PIR templates + mapping + rules
[Image of ISO 19650 information requirements hierarchy]
70%+ Distinction
  • Clear, accurate EIRs using relevant templates (OIR, PIR, AIR)
  • Tasks mapped with correct verification rules
  • Correct classification applied where needed
60-69% Merit
  • Mostly correct EIRs with minor errors
  • Task mapping present (may miss small elements)
50-59% Pass
  • EIRs included but inconsistent template use
  • Some gaps in rules or task assignment
Below 50% Fail
  • Incomplete or incorrect EIRs
  • Missing verification rules
  • Unclear task assignment
Task 2
BEP + MIDP + Work Package Setup
Responsibilities + milestones + model links
[Image of MIDP and TIDP structure]
70%+ Distinction
  • Tailored BEP & MIDP
  • Clear responsibilities, milestones, and dependencies
  • Work packages linked to correct models
60-69% Merit
  • BEP and MIDP present
  • Most tasks assigned
  • Model linkages may lack detail
50-59% Pass
  • Basic BEP/MIDP submitted
  • Incomplete or not well-aligned
  • Models assigned with gaps
Below 50% Fail
  • BEP or MIDP missing or unclear
  • Work packages not created or not linked
Task 3
Model Verification and Handover Packaging
Verification + statuses + folder structure + report
[Image of BIM model verification flowchart]
70%+ Distinction
  • Verification run correctly and issues resolved
  • Relevant tasks marked complete
  • Placeholder file added properly
  • Structured folders created with proper naming conventions
  • All required files included + verification report included
60-69% Merit
  • Verification completed (small issues missed)
  • Task status mostly updated
  • Folder structure mostly correct
  • Minor naming issues or missing report
50-59% Pass
  • Basic model check completed
  • Task status not fully updated
  • Placeholder file may be missing
  • Folder exists but lacks structure / naming conventions
  • Report may be incomplete
Below 50% Fail
  • Verification not performed correctly
  • Status updates and placeholder absent
  • No clear handover structure / missing files
  • Non-compliance with standards
Task 4
Final Acceptance
Archive + sign-off + lessons learned
[Image of project information model to asset information model handover]
70%+ Distinction
  • Thorough review completed
  • Archive folder used correctly
  • Sign-off document complete with lessons learned
60-69% Merit
  • Final review evident
  • Archive present
  • Sign-off may lack reflection or signature
50-59% Pass
  • Final review basic
  • No archive or missing sign-off
Below 50% Fail
  • No evidence of final acceptance or review process
Bonus
Optional - added value
Extra effort + clarity + insight
70%+ Distinction
  • Insightful reflection, strong presentation, or added value
  • Examples: creative structure, extra detail, clearer organisation
60-69% Merit
  • Some extra effort shown
50-59% Pass
  • Minor enhancements
Below 50% Fail
  • No attempt for bonus work